Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs post $798.9 million in net outflows on October 30

Bitcoin funds account for most outflows

U.S. Bitcoin ETFs tracked by Farside recorded net outflows of $643.2 million during the October 30, 2026 session. The table reviewed shows $233.7 million for BlackRock’s IBIT, $201 million for Fidelity’s FBTC, and $129.5 million for ARKB. These are negative net flows expressed in dollars: the difference between subscriptions and redemptions within the tracked universe, rather than an estimate of value lost by all bitcoin holders.

GBTC also shows $53.3 million in outflows and BITB $25.7 million. Other rows are zero for that session. Concentration in particular products is different information from the aggregate total: it locates observed flows without implying that every fund experienced the same movement. A zero balance means only that no net flow is displayed; it does not, by itself, describe every trade in the shares during the day.

Ethereum records a separate negative balance

For Ethereum ETFs, Farside shows $155.7 million in net outflows. ETHA accounts for $76.6 million, Grayscale’s ETH product for $34.1 million, and ETHE for $21.5 million. ETHB shows $19.5 million, FETH $3.3 million, and MSSE $0.7 million. These amounts concern the products and session identified in the table. They should not be added to a change in ether’s price as though they were comparable measures of the same loss.

Adding the Bitcoin and Ethereum totals gives $798.9 million in net outflows across those fund groups. That calculation does not extend their coverage to every crypto product traded in the United States or worldwide. Instruments absent from the tables remain outside its scope. The comparison is useful for describing the session, provided its units, date, and product categories are retained rather than treating it as an overall market assessment.

Flows alone do not explain prices

Fund flows, trading volumes in their shares, and a cryptoasset’s market capitalization have different definitions. A negative net flow is therefore not an equal decline in market capitalization. The table also does not reveal each investor’s identity or motivation. Comparing it with a news event may raise an analytical question, but does not prove that the event caused every redemption. No price forecast follows mechanically from these data.

Farside says its tables are automatically generated and updated and can contain errors or corrections. The values reported here relate to the dated October 30 session as reviewed for this article. Subsequent monitoring should compare consistent records rather than mix successive updates. This report establishes a flow observation for identified investment vehicles; it does not establish that withdrawals will certainly continue or predict bitcoin’s or ether’s future price path.