DeFi & stablecoins
DBS: 88% of surveyed large businesses use or pilot tokenized money
The EY study commissioned by DBS surveyed 422 leaders at large organizations. It highlights payment and treasury applications while distinguishing pilots from widespread deployment.

A survey focused on large organizations
DBS published a survey on October 28, 2026, in which 88% of participating businesses said they were deploying or piloting tokenized money use cases. The result combines different situations: a company running a pilot falls within this group, alongside an organization already using these instruments. The figure therefore does not measure the share of businesses that have moved their entire treasury onto a blockchain, or the proportion of payments actually settled through these channels.
The report, The Great Rewiring: Money in a new order, was commissioned by DBS and conducted by EY. It draws on responses from 422 finance executives and business leaders at organizations with annual revenue above $500 million. The sample covers 11 markets across Asia, Europe, and North America. This focus on large organizations matters when interpreting the findings: the study does not represent all businesses or small and midsize companies.
Stablecoins, deposits, and funds are different instruments
Stablecoins were the most frequently cited tokenized instruments, at 63%, followed by tokenized deposits at 53% and tokenized money market funds at 52%. These categories can coexist within the same organization, so the percentages should not be added together as mutually exclusive shares. They also refer to different instruments. Digitizing a bank deposit and digitizing a fund share do not create the same financial relationship between the holder and the issuer.
Expected benefits primarily concern financial operations. Over the next two years, 72% of respondents expect improved traceability and auditability, while 71% anticipate real-time cross-border payments. Stronger internal controls and governance were cited by 66%, and improved treasury liquidity management by 65%. These are expectations expressed by participants, rather than productivity gains already recorded across every business in the survey.
Operational barriers and a commercially involved sponsor
The study identifies continuing barriers: regulatory and compliance uncertainty, data security, operational risks, limited expertise, and integration complexity. An available technology is therefore not enough to establish a payment process that can operate at scale. Respondents notably want banks to provide a single integration point into the ecosystem, at 64%, and support for pilots, proofs of concept, and integration, at 63%.
DBS also supplies financial services associated with these applications; it is not an outside observer of the market being studied. That commercial position accompanies self-reported findings from large organizations. The survey offers an indicator of interest and experimentation, together with specific treasury needs. Its 88% figure alone does not provide a universal measure of adoption, guarantee profitability, or demonstrate that compliance and interoperability constraints have disappeared.
